What can be concluded about clients who aren't doing well according to outcome-informed practice?

In the context of outcome-informed practice, clients who are not doing well often require more informed decision-making. This approach emphasizes the importance of utilizing data from client outcomes to continuously assess and adjust intervention strategies. When clients are struggling, it signals that the current strategies may not be effective, and therefore, a more nuanced understanding of their unique experiences and needs is critical.

This informed decision-making process might include gathering additional data, considering alternative interventions, or exploring new therapeutic approaches tailored specifically to the client's circumstances. The focus is on utilizing evidence and client feedback to enhance the effectiveness of treatment, rather than relying solely on established practices or assumptions that may not suit every individual.

The other options do not align with the principles of outcome-informed practice as directly. For example, requiring more assumptions contradicts the evidence-based nature of this approach, which values data and client feedback over assumptions. Similarly, treating clients according to past results may overlook the individual changes and needs that could be influencing their current situation, while misdiagnosis does not inherently relate to the process of outcome-informed practice but rather to the initial assessment process.